67 views 8 mins 0 comments

Moody’s Affirms YES BANK’s Ratings; Outlook Changed to ‘Stable’ from ‘Negative’

In Business
February 23, 2019

Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) has today affirmed Yes Bank Limited’s (“Yes Bank”) foreign currency issuer rating of Ba1.

Moody’s has also affirmed the bank’s foreign and local currency bank deposit ratings of Ba1/NP, foreign currency senior unsecured MTN program rating of (P)Ba1, and Baseline Credit Assessment (BCA) and adjusted BCA of ba2. At the same time, Moody’s has affirmed the bank’s counterparty risk assessment (CR Assessment) of Baa3(cr)/P-3(cr) and domestic and foreign currency counterparty risk rating (CRR) of Baa3/P-3.

For the bank’s IFSC Banking Unit Branch, Moody’s has also affirmed the foreign currency senior unsecured MTN program rating of (P)Ba1 and senior unsecured debt rating of Ba1. In addition, Moody’s has affirmed the IFSC Banking Unit Branch’s CR Assessment of Baa3(cr)/ P-3(cr), and domestic and foreign currency CRR of Baa3/P-3.

Moody’s has changed the outlook, where applicable, to stable from negative.
The rating action takes into account recent developments including: (1) the results of the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) risk assessment report (the so-called divergence report); and (2) Yes Bank’s stable financial performance. As a result, Moody’s has assessed that the downside risks to the bank’s credit profile have diminished. Moody’s has therefore changed the bank’s ratings outlook to stable from negative, because such risks form the key driver for the change in the outlook.

On 13 February 2019, Yes Bank announced that the RBI observed no divergence in the bank’s asset classification and provisioning. By contrast, in the two fiscal years ended March 2017 and 2016, there was significant divergence in the bank’s reported asset quality metrics when compared with the RBI’s assessment of asset quality.

In late-January 2019, the bank appointed Ravneet Gill as its MD and CEO, and completed the leadership transition from the bank’s founder and long-time MD and CEO, Rana Kapoor. The leadership transition was at the directive of the RBI in September 2018 to restrict Kapoor’s term until 31 January 2019.

The bank’s financial performance, including its asset quality, profitability and funding and liquidity position remain stable. Furthermore, its asset quality metrics and profitability are better than similarly rated Indian banks. However, Yes Bank’s high loan concentration to corporate groups increases the risk of volatility in the asset performance. In addition, Yes Bank’s funding profile, while improving, is weaker when compared to other rated banks in India, as measured by its low current and savings account deposit ratio and the dominance of corporate loans.

Moody’s continues to maintain a negative adjustment for corporate behavior in the bank’s standalone credit profile or BCA. In Moody’s opinion, although Yes Bank’s reported credit fundamentals remain stable, the bank’s aggressive growth strategy poses risks to its financial performance. While the RBI did not identify any divergence in the classification of asset quality for the year ended March 2018, it did highlight “several other lapses and regulatory breaches in various areas of the bank’s functioning”.

Moody’s has also maintained its assumption of a moderate probability of government support, reflecting the bank’s modest but rapidly growing franchise, and its relative importance to India’s banking system. This assumption results in a one-notch uplift to the bank’s deposits, senior unsecured debt, CRR and CRA from the bank’s preliminary rating assessment.

Given the stable ratings outlook, Moody’s is unlikely to upgrade the bank’s ratings during the outlook horizon of the next 12-18 months.

Nevertheless, Moody’s could change the ratings outlook to positive if (1) Yes Bank maintains its current asset quality profile; (2) the bank strengthens its loss absorbing buffers by bringing its capital ratios in line with similarly rated peers in India and strengthens its loan loss reserves; and (3) the bank meaningfully reduces concentration risk on the asset side and further improves its liability profile.

Moody’s could downgrade Yes Bank’s ratings if (1) there is a sustained deterioration in impaired loans or loan loss reserves, or if the rate of new nonperforming loan formation is significantly higher than previously experienced; and/or (2) the bank’s capital ratios decline due to its inability to raise new capital. The principal methodology used in these ratings was Banks published in August 2018. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. Yes Bank Limited is headquartered in Mumbai and reported total assets of INR3.7 trillion ($52.3 billion) at 31 December 2018.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices.

For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.